Methodology

A risk profile with context and evolution.

Assessment, critical factors and incident information contribute to prevention-focused decisions. Knowing the criteria is essential for interpreting results.

01 /

Assessment and driving context

Assessment considers components such as personal profile, driving exposure, performance and behavioural factors. Components and weightings should be explained for each assessment.

02 /

Base result and specific rules

Assessment results may be complemented by business-specific rules. A rule can set an exact or minimum risk level and define specific training. Its reason should be distinguished from the base result.

03 /

Incidents and investigation

A record describes what happened. Analysis and investigation seek to understand context and contributing factors before guiding measures. An incident alone does not establish a cause or responsibility.

04 /

Reviewing risk and measures

New assessments and applicable rules support risk level review. Incident, investigation and follow-up information provides context for adapting measures. Comparisons should account for exposure and assessment conditions.

Methodology

A result to guide analysis.

A profile should be interpreted in the context of the assessment and the information available. It is not a permanent label and cannot support conclusions beyond what the data allows.

Transparency at every stage.

Can one factor justify intervention?

Yes. A rule can define a response to one factor or a combination of conditions even when the overall result is not high. Response and priority depend on configured criteria.

How does an incident inform risk review?

An incident is analysed in context. Risk review follows applicable criteria; triage, investigation and findings help guide a grounded response rather than treating all cases in the same way.

How can departments be compared?

Profiles can be explored by groups representing your business structure. Differences need to be interpreted considering exposure, roles and group composition, without deriving causes from averages alone.

Who can see the results?

Access to individual information and incidents should be defined and communicated when preparing the project, according to each participant’s responsibilities.

The next step

See how it applies to your business.

Explore driver assessment, incident reporting tailored to your business and rules for intervention and follow-up.

Request a demo